Review how a state electricity tariff order treats different kinds of consumers
Electricity tariffs often charge homes, shops and farms differently, and the pattern hides trade-offs between cost, fairness and the utility's finances.
A two-page review of one tariff order covering the consumer categories, the logic of the slabs, who seems to be helped and who pays more, with three questions you would put to the regulator.
This is a research brief project. Find out what is known about a question from public sources and say what it means.
The approach: Write the question in one sentence → List the documents that would answer it → Read and note before you summarise → Separate what sources say from what you conclude.
Think first
A state electricity tariff order charges homes, shops, farms and factories differently, and slabs within each group. The question is what logic the order gives for these differences, who seems to be helped and who seems to pay for that help.
- Which consumer categories does the order list, and which ones matter for your review?
- What reason does the order itself give for slabs that rise with use?
- Where does one group appear to pay more so another can pay less, and how sure can you be?
- What would you need to know that the order does not say?
A two-page review with a table of categories and how each is treated in words, a short section on the logic of the slabs in the order's own reasoning, a careful paragraph on who may be paying for whom, and three sharp questions for the regulator.
Copying rates into the review or calculating bills. The task is to understand the pattern and its trade-offs, not to reproduce the tariff schedule.
Gather
- The latest tariff order or its summary from your state electricity regulator's public page, saved as a file
- The section of the order that explains cross-subsidy or the reasons for each category's tariff
- A household electricity bill (your own) to see how slabs appear, with the account number hidden
AI must not supply rates, subsidy figures or reasons the order does not give. Where the order is silent, write 'not stated in the order' rather than filling the gap.
Build with AI
- 3.1 Map the categories from the orderCLAUDE WORKING ON YOUR FILES (FORMERLY COWORK)
Why this tool: Claude working on the saved order can list every consumer category and where it appears, which is hard to do by scrolling a long document.
Put the order in a folder. Ask for a list of categories with page references and a one-line description in words, no rates. Check each against the order.
Before you let it act: Confirm the folder holds only the public order and no bill with your account details. Open three listed pages yourself to check the references are right.
- 3.2 Decode the jargonCLAUDE CHAT
Why this tool: Tariff orders use terms like cross-subsidy and fixed charge that Claude can explain quickly.
Paste short extracts and ask for plain meanings. Check each meaning against how the order uses the word.
- 3.3 Test your who-pays-for-whom reasoningCLAUDE CHAT
Why this tool: A sceptical reader shows where you have claimed more than the order supports.
Write your paragraph first. Then ask Claude to mark each claim as supported by the order, reasoned, or overstated.
- 3.4 Sharpen three questions for the regulatorCLAUDE CHAT
Why this tool: Good questions name a specific gap in the order; Claude can help make vague ones precise.
Draft three questions and ask which are too broad. Keep the final wording your own.
Check the AI's work
- No rates or amounts appear anywhere in the review
- Every category in your table has a page reference to the order
- Each statement about the slab logic quotes or paraphrases the order's own reasons
- Your who-pays paragraph says how sure you are and why
- Each regulator question points to something the order does not answer
- Open every source the AI cites and confirm it says what the AI claims
- Mark each sentence as a source fact or your own conclusion
AI assumes farm power is free or industry always pays more, as in other states. Your review must describe what this order says, not a national pattern.
Finish and show
- Category table with descriptions and page references
- The slab logic in the order's own reasoning
- A careful who-pays-for-whom paragraph
- Three questions for the regulator
- Source details for the order
Two pages: the category table on page one with a short note, the analysis and questions on page two.
Explain the one category whose treatment surprised you and what question you would most like the regulator to answer.
Which tool fits
- Claude working on your files (formerly Cowork): Claude working on the saved order can list every consumer category and where it appears, which is hard to do by scrolling a long document.Paid plans. Rolled into ordinary chat from 16 Sep 2026; check what your plan shows.
- Claude chat: Tariff orders use terms like cross-subsidy and fixed charge that Claude can explain quickly.Free plan works; Pro gives longer conversations.
- Claude Research: a first sweep of public sources, with links you then openPaid plans; check what your plan shows.
- Perplexity (free alternative): a free search that shows the source beside every answerFree plan works.
- NotebookLM (free alternative): asking questions only of the documents you downloadedFree with a Google account.
Repeat the review for a neighbouring state's order and compare how the two treat the same category.
AI helps you think, check and polish. The work, and the judgement, stay yours.
This is a free sample. Full Access opens every project in full and lets you submit your finished work.
See Full Access →